
Scattering entropy ( H ), scattering angle ( α ) and anti‐entropy ( A ) are useful parameters in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image classification. Usually, full‐polarimetric SAR data are needed to extract these parameters. In this study, the authors firstly try to predict these parameters from single/dual‐polarimetric SAR data using convolutional neural network. Experiments are done on GF‐3 polarised SAR database, and promising results are obtained, where the parameters H and α , the average relative error reached is <10%, the parameter A , the average relative error reached is around 25%, and the classification performance based on predictive parameters is around 80%. Furthermore, the predicting performance using different single‐ and dual‐polarisation is compared. The results and conclusions provide a new clue for the applications of single/dual‐polarimetric SAR.
scattering entropy, radar computing, convolutional neural network, radar polarimetry, antientropy, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), sar image classification, synthetic aperture radar image classification, radar imaging, single-dual-polarimetric sar data, convolutional neural nets, full-polarimetric sar data, predictive parameters, TA1-2040, average relative error, image classification, synthetic aperture radar, full-polarimetric scattering characteristic prediction, gf-3 polarised sar database
scattering entropy, radar computing, convolutional neural network, radar polarimetry, antientropy, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), sar image classification, synthetic aperture radar image classification, radar imaging, single-dual-polarimetric sar data, convolutional neural nets, full-polarimetric sar data, predictive parameters, TA1-2040, average relative error, image classification, synthetic aperture radar, full-polarimetric scattering characteristic prediction, gf-3 polarised sar database
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
