
pmid: 36152325
OBJECTIVE Mechanical complications should be considered following the correction of multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusion. This study aimed to investigate clinical data on the patients’ pre- and postoperative cervical alignment in terms of the incidence of mechanical complications after multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusion. METHODS Between January 2008 and December 2018, 156 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical laminectomy and instrumented fusion surgery of 4 or more levels and were followed up for more than 2 years were included in this study. Age, sex, bone mineral density (BMD), BMI, mechanical complications, and pre- and postoperative radiographic factors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis to investigate the factors related to mechanical complications. RESULTS Of the 156 patients, 114 were men and 42 were women; the mean age was 60.38 years (range 25–83 years), and the mean follow-up duration of follow-up was 37.56 months (range 24–128 months). Thirty-seven patients (23.7%) experienced mechanical complications, and 6 of them underwent revision surgery. The significant risk factors for mechanical complications were low BMD T-score (−1.36 vs −0.58, p = 0.001), a large number of fused vertebrae (5.08 vs 4.54, p = 0.003), a large preoperative C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 32.28 vs 23.24 mm, p = 0.002), and low preoperative C2–7 lordosis (1.85° vs 8.83°, p = 0.001). The clinical outcomes demonstrated overall improvement in both groups; however, the neck visual analog scale, Neck Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores after surgery were significantly worse in the mechanical complication group compared with the group without mechanical complications. CONCLUSIONS Low BMD, a large number of fused vertebrae, a large preoperative C2–7 SVA, and low C2–7 lordosis were significant risk factors for mechanical complications after posterior cervical fusion surgery. The results of this study could be valuable for preoperative counseling, medical treatment, or surgical planning when multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusion surgery is performed.
Male, Adult, Kyphosis* / surgery, Postoperative Complications / etiology, proximal junctional kyphosis, distal junctional kyphosis, 610, Postoperative Complications / diagnostic imaging, Laminectomy / adverse effects, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, 80 and over, Humans, Kyphosis, Spinal Fusion* / adverse effects, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cervical Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging, Aged, 80 and over, posterior cervical fusion surgery, sagittal alignment, Laminectomy, Middle Aged, Spinal Fusion, Treatment Outcome, Postoperative Complications / epidemiology, Lordosis* / diagnostic imaging, mechanical complication, Lordosis, Cervical Vertebrae, Female, Lordosis* / surgery, Cervical Vertebrae / surgery, bone mineral density, Spinal Fusion* / methods
Male, Adult, Kyphosis* / surgery, Postoperative Complications / etiology, proximal junctional kyphosis, distal junctional kyphosis, 610, Postoperative Complications / diagnostic imaging, Laminectomy / adverse effects, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, 80 and over, Humans, Kyphosis, Spinal Fusion* / adverse effects, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cervical Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging, Aged, 80 and over, posterior cervical fusion surgery, sagittal alignment, Laminectomy, Middle Aged, Spinal Fusion, Treatment Outcome, Postoperative Complications / epidemiology, Lordosis* / diagnostic imaging, mechanical complication, Lordosis, Cervical Vertebrae, Female, Lordosis* / surgery, Cervical Vertebrae / surgery, bone mineral density, Spinal Fusion* / methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
