
AbstractThe transcriptomic diversity of cell types in the human body can be analysed in unprecedented detail using single cell (SC) technologies. Unsupervised clustering of SC transcriptomes, which is the default technique for defining cell types, is prone to group cells by technical, rather than biological, variation. Compared to de-novo (unsupervised) clustering, we demonstrate using multiple benchmarks that supervised clustering, which uses reference transcriptomes as a guide, is robust to batch effects and data quality artifacts. Here, we present RCA2, the first algorithm to combine reference projection (batch effect robustness) with graph-based clustering (scalability). In addition, RCA2 provides a user-friendly framework incorporating multiple commonly used downstream analysis modules. RCA2 also provides new reference panels for human and mouse and supports generation of custom panels. Furthermore, RCA2 facilitates cell type-specific QC, which is essential for accurate clustering of data from heterogeneous tissues. We demonstrate the advantages of RCA2 on SC data from human bone marrow, healthy PBMCs and PBMCs from COVID-19 patients. Scalable supervised clustering methods such as RCA2 will facilitate unified analysis of cohort-scale SC datasets.
Quality Control, Computational Biology, COVID-19, Datasets as Topic, Bone Marrow Cells, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cohort Studies, Mice, Organ Specificity, RNA, Small Cytoplasmic, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Animals, Cluster Analysis, Humans, RNA-Seq, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Algorithms
Quality Control, Computational Biology, COVID-19, Datasets as Topic, Bone Marrow Cells, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cohort Studies, Mice, Organ Specificity, RNA, Small Cytoplasmic, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Animals, Cluster Analysis, Humans, RNA-Seq, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
