
handle: 11311/1144467
The design of quantum-resistant cryptographic primitives has gained attraction lately, especially thanks to the U.S.A. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) initiative, which is selecting a portfolio of primitives for standardization. A prime position in the set of asymmetric encryption primitives is occupied by the ones relying on decoding random linear error correction codes as their trapdoor. Among these primitives, the LEDAcrypt and BIKE cryptosystems have been admitted to the second round of the standardization initiative. They are based on the adoption of iteratively decoded Low- and Moderate-Density Parity Check (LDPC/MDPC) codes. Characterizing the decoding failure rate of such codes under iterative decoding is paramount to the security of both the LEDAcrypt and BIKE second round candidates to achieve indistinguishability under adaptive chosen ciphertext attacks (IND-CCA2). For these codes, we propose a new iterative decoder, obtained through a simple modification of the classic in-place bit-flipping decoder and, in this paper, we provide a statistical worst-case analysis of its performance. This result allows us to design parameters for LDPC/MDPC code-based cryptosystems with guaranteed extremely low failure rates (e.g., 2-128 ), fitting the hard requirement imposed by IND-CCA2 constructions.
Bit-flipping Decoding, Code-based Cryptosystems, Decoding Failure Rate, LDPC Codes, MDPC Codes, Quasi-cyclic Codes, Post-quantum Cryptosystems
Bit-flipping Decoding, Code-based Cryptosystems, Decoding Failure Rate, LDPC Codes, MDPC Codes, Quasi-cyclic Codes, Post-quantum Cryptosystems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
