
pmid: 37756699
pmc: PMC10564617
Abstract Motivation Spatial domain identification is a very important problem in the field of spatial transcriptomics. The state-of-the-art solutions to this problem focus on unsupervised methods, as there is lack of data for a supervised learning formulation. The results obtained from these methods highlight significant opportunities for improvement. Results In this article, we propose a potential avenue for enhancement through the development of a semi-supervised convolutional neural network based approach. Named “ScribbleDom”, our method leverages human expert’s input as a form of semi-supervision, thereby seamlessly combines the cognitive abilities of human experts with the computational power of machines. ScribbleDom incorporates a loss function that integrates two crucial components: similarity in gene expression profiles and adherence to the valuable input of a human annotator through scribbles on histology images, providing prior knowledge about spot labels. The spatial continuity of the tissue domains is taken into account by extracting information on the spot microenvironment through convolution filters of varying sizes, in the form of “Inception” blocks. By leveraging this semi-supervised approach, ScribbleDom significantly improves the quality of spatial domains, yielding superior results both quantitatively and qualitatively. Our experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrate the clear edge of ScribbleDom over state-of-the-art methods—between 1.82% to 169.38% improvements in adjusted Rand index for 9 of the 12 human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex samples, and 15.54% improvement in the melanoma cancer dataset. Notably, when the expert input is absent, ScribbleDom can still operate, in a fully unsupervised manner like the state-of-the-art methods, and produces results that remain competitive. Availability and implementation Source code is available at Github (https://github.com/1alnoman/ScribbleDom) and Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/681572669).
Advanced Techniques in Bioimage Analysis and Microscopy, Artificial neural network, Artificial intelligence, Medical Sciences, Phenotypic Profiling, Biophysics, Convolutional neural network, Pattern recognition (psychology), Biochemistry, Mathematical analysis, Spatial Profiling, Identification (biology), Convolution (computer science), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Field (mathematics), Microarray Data Analysis and Gene Expression Profiling, Machine learning, Medical Specialties, Medicine and Health Sciences, Image (mathematics), FOS: Mathematics, Droplet-based Sequencing, Similarity (geometry), Transcriptomics, Molecular Biology, Data mining, Biology, Original Paper, Domain (mathematical analysis), Geography, Physics, Pure mathematics, Botany, Life Sciences, 600, Deep learning, Optics, Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data, Focus (optics), Computer science, and Structural Biology, Benchmark (surveying), Mathematics, Geodesy
Advanced Techniques in Bioimage Analysis and Microscopy, Artificial neural network, Artificial intelligence, Medical Sciences, Phenotypic Profiling, Biophysics, Convolutional neural network, Pattern recognition (psychology), Biochemistry, Mathematical analysis, Spatial Profiling, Identification (biology), Convolution (computer science), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Field (mathematics), Microarray Data Analysis and Gene Expression Profiling, Machine learning, Medical Specialties, Medicine and Health Sciences, Image (mathematics), FOS: Mathematics, Droplet-based Sequencing, Similarity (geometry), Transcriptomics, Molecular Biology, Data mining, Biology, Original Paper, Domain (mathematical analysis), Geography, Physics, Pure mathematics, Botany, Life Sciences, 600, Deep learning, Optics, Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data, Focus (optics), Computer science, and Structural Biology, Benchmark (surveying), Mathematics, Geodesy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
