Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1109/i2mtc6...
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: STM Policy #29
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Accuracy evaluation of ECG waves detection and segmentation

Authors: D'Alvia, Livio; Palermo, Eduardo; Del Prete, Zaccaria;

Accuracy evaluation of ECG waves detection and segmentation

Abstract

Wearable wireless devices are vital in regulating lifestyles and facilitating telemedicine and home healthcare monitoring. Despite abundant low-cost sensor options flooding the market, only a handful have received validation and certification for clinical use. This study offers initial insights from a detailed evaluation of an electrocardiography (ECG) tool designed for patients' self-managed monitoring of cardiovascular diseases. The primary focus of this assessment is on examining the functionality of the MAX30003 integrated circuit and the essential characteristics embedded within its firmware. The study also investigates six cardiac conditions requiring thorough and continual ECG monitoring. To assess accuracy, the experimental setup utilizes a National Instruments USB6001, applying seven distinct signals-Typical, Hyper- and Hypo-calcemia, Hyper- and Hypo-kalaemia, Ventricular and Atrial Tachycardia-under three overlapping and non-overlapping noise sources: white noise, powerline noise, and their combination. Results from the accuracy evaluation demonstrate the integrated circuit's performance, revealing a normalized root mean square error lower than 10% in the worst-case scenario (signal with power line and noise) and an average of 2.5% in the best-case scenario (no noise). Similarly, repeatability and reproducibility are higher overall for TYP ECG. PLN is the noise that least affects repeatability, while white noise is the least attenuated one. Moreover, it achieves a 95% detection rate for P, R, and S peaks, 98% precise segmentation for the QRS complex, and 95% precision for P and S peaks under no-noise conditions. In noise conditions, precise segmentation rates are slightly lower, at 87% for the QRS complex and 91% for P and S-peaks. Preliminary results from healthy subjects align with those from systemic signals, indicating promising segmentation performance. These findings provide crucial insights into the potential effectiveness of the MAX30003 for accurate ECG monitoring across diverse cardiovascular scenarios.

Related Organizations
Keywords

accuracy assessment; clinical measurement; wearable devices; electrocardiography; ecg wave segmentation algorithm; ecg waveform; cardiac activity monitoring; heartbeat monitoring; degenerative disease

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!