
In Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, for any input, multiple communicative goals are plausible, and any goal can be put into words, or produced, in multiple ways. We characterise the extent to which human production varies lexically, syntactically, and semantically across four NLG tasks, connecting human production variability to aleatoric or data uncertainty. We then inspect the space of output strings shaped by a generation system's predicted probability distribution and decoding algorithm to probe its uncertainty. For each test input, we measure the generator's calibration to human production variability. Following this instance-level approach, we analyse NLG models and decoding strategies, demonstrating that probing a generator with multiple samples and, when possible, multiple references, provides the level of detail necessary to gain understanding of a model's representation of uncertainty. Code available at https://github.com/dmg-illc/nlg-uncertainty-probes.
Camera ready version for EMNLP 2023
Decoding algorithm, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Syntactic variability, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Model calibration, Aleatoric uncertainty, Human production variability, Semantic variability, 004, 620, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Natural Language Generation, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Uncertainty representation, Lexical variability, Communicative goals, Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Decoding algorithm, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Syntactic variability, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Model calibration, Aleatoric uncertainty, Human production variability, Semantic variability, 004, 620, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Natural Language Generation, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Uncertainty representation, Lexical variability, Communicative goals, Computation and Language (cs.CL)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
