
Introduction. Efforts made to increase the competencies of librarians can be made through the publication of scientific writing. The research aims to determine the competence of librarians in the publication of scientific writing at the Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah Higher Education Library Forum Regional Coordinator for the Special Region of Yogyakarta-South Central Java (FPPTMA Regional Coordinator DIY-South Java). Research methods. This study used a qualitative method, with informants 15 people with snowball sampling. Data collection used observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques use data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. To test the validity of the data, we used triangulation techniques. Results and Discussion. Librarians' ability to publish scientific writing is based on their competencies in motive, character, self-concept, knowledge, and skills. The impact of scientific writing publication competency encourages librarians to be productive in producing scientific writing publications which will increase librarian branding. Conclusion and recommendations. Librarians who have consistent character will produce quality scientific writing. It cannot be separated from communication skills and mastery of scientific writing techniques. This research suggests establishing a regular writing program that can facilitate librarians in their work.
DIY Coordinator of South Java, scientific writing publications, librarian competency, librarian scientific writing, FPPTMA, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, Z
DIY Coordinator of South Java, scientific writing publications, librarian competency, librarian scientific writing, FPPTMA, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, Z
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
