
arXiv: 2302.05980
In the international standard for system and software engineering ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288: 2015, the output of the stakeholder needs and the business or mission analysis technical processes are transformed into a technical view of the system by the system requirements definition process. In model-based systems engineering, functional needs can be modeled by use case diagrams. Intended outcomes of system requirements definition include resolution of disagreement about requirements, explicit agreement between stakeholders, and traceability. However, stakeholder needs are often elicited in a siloed manner and may be inconsistent. The lack of mathematically based systematic approaches for requirements definition poses a challenge to model-based transformation of needs into a technical view of the system that achieves agreement between stakeholders. This paper specifies and demonstrates mathematical frameworks for rationalizing and synthesizing functional needs that have been captured through an elicitation process. Benefits of this approach include but are not limited to supporting rigorous identification and resolution of disagreements and facilitating systematic analysis of change impact to achieve stakeholder agreement all with minimal intervention by the system engineers.
Accepted version, to appear in IEEE Open Journal of Systems Engineering
FOS: Computer and information sciences, model rationalization, model synchronization, Systems engineering, systems modeling language (SysML), Software Engineering (cs.SE), TA168, Computer Science - Software Engineering, Model-based systems engineering, stakeholder requirements, model synthesis
FOS: Computer and information sciences, model rationalization, model synchronization, Systems engineering, systems modeling language (SysML), Software Engineering (cs.SE), TA168, Computer Science - Software Engineering, Model-based systems engineering, stakeholder requirements, model synthesis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
