Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YUHSpace (Yonsei Uni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Brain Injury
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Brain Injury
Article . 2009
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Functional recovery following traumatic vs non-traumatic brain injury: A case-controlled study

Authors: Nora K, Cullen; Yoon-Ghil, Park; Mark T, Bayley;

Functional recovery following traumatic vs non-traumatic brain injury: A case-controlled study

Abstract

To explore differences in rate of recovery and functional outcome in case-matched patients with traumatic (TBI) vs non-traumatic brain injury (non-TBI) during inpatient rehabilitation and 1 year post-insult.Retrospective comparison study and case-controlled design.Demographic data, severity of injury, functional outcome measures and outcomes at 1 year follow-up were collected on 573 patients (404 TBI; 169 non-TBI) admitted to a multidisciplinary neurorehabilitation programme. After general cohort comparisons, 86 TBI and 86 non-TBI patients were matched on age, severity of injury and functional outcome scores.In the general cohort analyses, TBI patients demonstrated better outcomes at discharge as indicated by lower Disability Rating Scale (DRS) scores and higher gain and efficiency scores on both motor and cognitive sub-scales of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). After matching patients, TBI patients showed greater functional improvement throughout their rehabilitation stay. Outcomes at 1 year follow-up were mixed; TBI patients showed better outcomes compared to non-TBI patients on DRS scores; however, FIM scores were not significantly different.Results from the present study support the hypothesis that TBI patients achieve greater functional improvements compared to non-TBI patients when matched according to injury and demographic characteristics.

Keywords

Recovery of Function*, Adult, Male, Cerebrovascular Disorders/rehabilitation, Cerebrovascular Disorders/psychology, 610, Cerebrovascular Disorders/physiopathology, non-traumatic brain injury, Brain Injuries/etiology, rehabilitation, Disability Evaluation, Young Adult, Traffic, Humans, Glasgow Coma Scale, Brain Injuries/rehabilitation*, Aged, traumatic brain injury, Accidents, Traffic, Recovery of Function, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Brain Injuries/physiopathology, Outcome assessment, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Accidents, Brain Injuries, Case-Control Studies, Female, Brain Injuries/psychology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Green