
There is considerable promising in artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithms, with governments worldwide increasingly investing in this transformative technology. The potential benefits include improved performance, cost reduction, efficient management, and crime prediction and prevention, among others. The AI era holds the promise of revolutionizing various aspects of society. However, as countries prepare to leverage the power of artificial intelligence, questions arise about the validity of rankings published on the readiness of the governments for the application of AI. In this article, the weighting criteria that are analysed in the Oxford Insights AI Readiness Index are scrutinized, aiming to provide a more accurate assessment. Instead of conventional averaging, arithmetic and geometric non-linear functions are employed to analyse and assess the rank of the countries. Through clustering analysis, countries are categorized into three distinct groups based on observed criteria, offering a nuanced perspective on government AI readiness. This clustering approach not only facilitates a more effective categorization of countries based on their AI preparedness, but also accentuates the variations and similarities within each cluster, which enables deeper insights into regional trends and pinpoint targeted strategies for enhancement within each cluster.
AI readiness rankings, Weighting criteria, Clustering analysis, Oxford Insights AI Readiness Index, Artificial intelligence (AI), Non-linear analysis
AI readiness rankings, Weighting criteria, Clustering analysis, Oxford Insights AI Readiness Index, Artificial intelligence (AI), Non-linear analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
