
In recent years, significant advancements have been made in endovascular therapy for aortic dissection, resulting in the development of various treatment methods. Nevertheless, there is a contentious discussion regarding the suitability of different treatment methods for addressing the unique features of individual lesions. Specifically, the matter of whether the presence of small intimal tears or multiple distal tears requires extensive aortic coverage with graft stents, which may block the blood supply to important organs, intercostal arteries, or lumbar arteries, remains unresolved. Further research is necessary to determine the need for complex fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) in the management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms involving visceral arteries. Our report highlights the successful endovascular repair of three patients with aortic dissection, encompassing one Stanford A type and two Stanford B types. Utilizing the Amplatzer Vascular Plug (AVP) alone or in combination with the coil embolization technique, we achieved favorable clinical outcomes. This article aims to provide valuable insights and new perspectives on the tailored management of aortic dissection by conducting a comprehensive examination of the subtle differences in the treatment processes and techniques applied to these three patients.
endovascular treatment, RC666-701, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, embolization technique, amplatzer vascular plug, aortic dissection, Cardiovascular Medicine, coils
endovascular treatment, RC666-701, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, embolization technique, amplatzer vascular plug, aortic dissection, Cardiovascular Medicine, coils
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
