
Abstract Purpose Blood cultures (BCs) are key for pathogen detection in septic patients. We investigated the extent to which sampling was performed and what factors were associated with the absence of general or inadequate BC sampling. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with sepsis admitted to one of three EDs in 2018. Primary outcome was the extent of general BC collection of at least 1 set. Secondary outcome was the extent of adequate BC sampling, defined as ≥ 2 sets before antibiotic therapy (AT). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with deficits in both outcomes. Results 1143 patients were analyzed. BCs were collected from 946 patients. Single BCs were taken from 520 patients, ≥ 2 sets from 426 patients. Overall, ≥ 2 BCs were taken from 349 patients before AT. BC sampling before AT occurred significantly more frequently when ≥ 2 BC sets were taken rather than a single one (81.9%, versus 68.4%, p < 0.001) and this also led to the highest pathogen detection rate in our cohort (65.6%). A body temperature of ≥ 38 °C was the a supporting factor for general and adequate BC collection in all three EDs. Retrospective analysis of 533 patients showed that the qSOFA score had no influence on general or adequate BC collection. Conclusion Data on everyday clinical practice in the pre-analytical phase of microbiological diagnostics shows considerable deficits and indicates the need for more implementation of best practice. The variations identified in BC sampling between EDs should be further investigated.
Male, Aged, 80 and over, Adult, Blood Specimen Collection, Sepsis/microbiology [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Rational antibiotic use ; Diagnostic stewardship ; Humans [MeSH] ; Retrospective Studies [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Blood Culture/methods [MeSH] ; Blood cultures ; Specimen Handling/methods [MeSH] ; Cohort Studies [MeSH] ; Blood Specimen Collection/methods [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Emergency Service, Hospital [MeSH] ; Sepsis/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Research ; Sepsis ; Emergency department, Research, Middle Aged, Specimen Handling, Cohort Studies, Blood Culture, Sepsis, Humans, Female, Emergency Service, Hospital, Retrospective Studies, Aged
Male, Aged, 80 and over, Adult, Blood Specimen Collection, Sepsis/microbiology [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Rational antibiotic use ; Diagnostic stewardship ; Humans [MeSH] ; Retrospective Studies [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Blood Culture/methods [MeSH] ; Blood cultures ; Specimen Handling/methods [MeSH] ; Cohort Studies [MeSH] ; Blood Specimen Collection/methods [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Emergency Service, Hospital [MeSH] ; Sepsis/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Research ; Sepsis ; Emergency department, Research, Middle Aged, Specimen Handling, Cohort Studies, Blood Culture, Sepsis, Humans, Female, Emergency Service, Hospital, Retrospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
