
Abstract Background This prospective clinical study evaluates the effect of a silicone stent tube (SST) on the success rate of endonasal-endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) to treat primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive EN-DCR with or without SST intubation over a period of 3 months. The surgery was performed using standardized techniques. Patients were assessed at three different timepoints: one day, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after the surgery. The results were compared in order to evaluate statistical differences. Surgical success was determined by means of positive irrigation procedures, as well as by the improvement of symptoms and a high level of patient satisfaction. Results A total of 56 randomized cases completed 24 weeks of follow up. 1 Patient dropped out due to malignant genesis of the nasolacrimal duct obstruction. After 24 weeks of follow up no statistically significant differences in levels of epiphora (p > .10) or patency (p > .16) were revealed. Comparisons regarding changes in time did not show levels of significance (p > .28). Conclusions This study could not confirm a statistically significant benefit or disadvantage for SST Insertion in EN-DCR.
Male, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Original Paper, Silicones, Endoscopy, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Stents [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Epiphora ; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction/therapy [MeSH] ; SST ; Female [MeSH] ; Silicones [MeSH] ; PANDO ; Follow-Up Studies [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Success rate ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Treatment Outcome [MeSH] ; Endoscopy/methods [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Nasolacrimal Duct/surgery [MeSH] ; Original Paper ; Dacryocystorhinostomy/methods [MeSH] ; EN-DCR ; Intubation/instrumentation [MeSH] ; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Intubation/methods [MeSH] ; Irrigation, Treatment Outcome, Lacrimal Duct Obstruction, Humans, Female, Stents, Prospective Studies, Intubation, Dacryocystorhinostomy, Nasolacrimal Duct, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Original Paper, Silicones, Endoscopy, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over [MeSH] ; Stents [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Epiphora ; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction/therapy [MeSH] ; SST ; Female [MeSH] ; Silicones [MeSH] ; PANDO ; Follow-Up Studies [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Success rate ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Treatment Outcome [MeSH] ; Endoscopy/methods [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Nasolacrimal Duct/surgery [MeSH] ; Original Paper ; Dacryocystorhinostomy/methods [MeSH] ; EN-DCR ; Intubation/instrumentation [MeSH] ; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Intubation/methods [MeSH] ; Irrigation, Treatment Outcome, Lacrimal Duct Obstruction, Humans, Female, Stents, Prospective Studies, Intubation, Dacryocystorhinostomy, Nasolacrimal Duct, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
