
doi: 10.1049/cit2.12408
Abstract In the era of big data, personalised recommendation systems are essential for enhancing user engagement and driving business growth. However, traditional recommendation algorithms, such as collaborative filtering, face significant challenges due to data sparsity, algorithm scalability, and the difficulty of adapting to dynamic user preferences. These limitations hinder the ability of systems to provide highly accurate and personalised recommendations. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a clustering‐based recommendation method that integrates an enhanced Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm (GOA), termed LCGOA, to improve the accuracy and efficiency of recommendation systems by optimising cluster centroids in a dynamic environment. By combining the K‐means algorithm with the enhanced GOA, which incorporates a Lévy flight mechanism and multi‐strategy co‐evolution, our method overcomes the centroid sensitivity issue, a key limitation in traditional clustering techniques. Experimental results across multiple datasets show that the proposed LCGOA‐based method significantly outperforms conventional recommendation algorithms in terms of recommendation accuracy, offering more relevant content to users and driving greater customer satisfaction and business growth.
QA76.75-76.765, Lévy flight, collaborative recommendation, K‐means clustering, Computational linguistics. Natural language processing, Computer software, P98-98.5, Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA)
QA76.75-76.765, Lévy flight, collaborative recommendation, K‐means clustering, Computational linguistics. Natural language processing, Computer software, P98-98.5, Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
