
handle: 11368/3073820
In most high-risk applications, interpretability is crucial for ensuring system safety and trust. However, existing research often relies on hard-to-understand, highly parameterized models, such as neural networks. In this paper, we focus on the problem of policy search in continuous observations and actions spaces. We leverage two graph-based Genetic Programming (GP) techniques—Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) and Linear Genetic Programming (LGP)—to develop effective yet interpretable control policies. Our experimental evaluation on eight continuous robotic control benchmarks shows competitive results compared to state-of-the-art Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms. Moreover, we find that graph-based GP tends towards small, interpretable graphs even when competitive with RL. By examining these graphs, we are able to explain the discovered policies, paving the way for trustworthy AI in the domain of continuous control.
Graph-based Genetic Programming; Cartesian Genetic Programming; Linear Genetic Programming; Interpretable Policy; Continuous Control, Graph-based Genetic Programming, Linear Genetic Programming, Interpretable Policy, Continuous Control, Cartesian Genetic Programming
Graph-based Genetic Programming; Cartesian Genetic Programming; Linear Genetic Programming; Interpretable Policy; Continuous Control, Graph-based Genetic Programming, Linear Genetic Programming, Interpretable Policy, Continuous Control, Cartesian Genetic Programming
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
