
If part of a population is hidden but two or more samples are available that each cover parts of this population, multiple systems estimation can be applied to estimate the size of this population. A problem is that these estimates suffer from finite-sample bias that can be substantial in case of a small sample or a small population size. This problem was recognized by Chapman, who derived his essentially unbiased Chapman-estimator for two samples. Because more than two samples may be required to correct for sample dependence, we propose a Generalized Chapman-estimator that can be applied with any number of samples. In a Monte Carlo experiment, this new estimator shows hardly any bias and has smaller standard errors than competing bias-reduced estimators. It is also compared to the usual maximum likelihood estimates for the case of estimating the number of homeless people in the Netherlands, where it shows notably different outcomes.
Log-linear model, FOS: Computer and information sciences, 330, multiple systems estimation, Statistics - Applications, Chapman estimator, Methodology (stat.ME), Finite sample bias, Applications (stat.AP), finite-sample bias, Multiple-systems estimation, log-linear model, Chapman-estimator, Statistics - Methodology
Log-linear model, FOS: Computer and information sciences, 330, multiple systems estimation, Statistics - Applications, Chapman estimator, Methodology (stat.ME), Finite sample bias, Applications (stat.AP), finite-sample bias, Multiple-systems estimation, log-linear model, Chapman-estimator, Statistics - Methodology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
