
doi: 10.1159/000544918
pmid: 40015252
Introduction: Comorbidity between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) is prevalent. Despite evidence-based therapies, high rates of nonresponse and dropout persist. This study therefore aimed to examine whether the concurrent application of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for PTSD and dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for BPD yields better results than EMDR alone. Methods: Patients with a PTSD diagnosis and at least four BPD symptoms were randomly assigned to EMDR (n = 63) or concurrent EMDR-DBT (n = 61). Over 1 year, changes in PTSD symptoms were measured using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5. Secondary outcomes included BPD symptoms, global functioning, and quality of life. Results: Both treatments led to large reductions in PTSD symptoms, without significant differences after 1 year (p = 0.312, d = −0.23, 95% CI = −0.6, 0.1). Both treatments also yielded large and comparable reductions in BPD symptoms and improved quality of life. Global functioning improved only in the EMDR condition according to one measure (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0), while the other measure (Outcome Questionnaire 45) showed improvements in both groups. Additionally, patients in the EMDR-DBT condition were twice as likely to drop out from EMDR treatment compared to those in the EMDR-only condition. Conclusion: Stand-alone EMDR demonstrated safety and efficacy in alleviating PTSD and BPD symptoms, as well as enhancing quality of life. These findings support the use of EMDR as a strong therapeutic option for patients with PTSD and comorbid BPD symptoms. Further research is needed to assess longer-term outcomes beyond 1 year.
Treatment, Borderline personality disorder, Posttraumatic stress disorder, Innovations
Treatment, Borderline personality disorder, Posttraumatic stress disorder, Innovations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
