
The article analyzes and compares existing approaches to the interpretation and defining content of categories that characterize life satisfaction, such as «quality of life», «standard of life» in order to differentiate them, identify essential foundations and differences. The indicators of quality and standard of living are systematized and classified. The emphasis is made on identifying urgent problems in determining the quality of life. Welfare assessment methodologies are critically reviewed. The author makes conclusion about the need for a subjective approach to the assessment of the concept of the level and quality of life in Kyrgyzstan.
quality of life, измерение благосостояния, уровень жизни, measurement of wellbeing, качество жизни, standard of living
quality of life, измерение благосостояния, уровень жизни, measurement of wellbeing, качество жизни, standard of living
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
