<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
With a combination of new data sources and mixed methods including bibliometrics, machine learning and network analysis, this study puts forward a new framework of categorizing different interdisciplinary collaboration patterns from a discipline-contribution perspective. Based on 20,542 research articles published on PLoS series of journals in 2018, 14,744 articles with interdisciplinary collaborations (ICAs) are recognized. By establishing six indicators that measure the variety, similarity and balance of authors’ disciplines and their contribution roles, ICAs are divided into four categories after the agglomerative hierarchical clustering. With a fine-grained analysis of the structural and correlation characteristics of authors’ disciplines and contribution in different clusters, four interdisciplinary collaboration patterns of sheep flock, bee colony, intercropping and rainforest are found. Our results may contribute to developing new methodologies and theories of interdisciplinary collaboration, and enrich the understanding of interdisciplinary collaboration as well as relevant policies.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |