
This article accentuates the estimation and prediction of a three-parameter exponentiated Gumbel type-II (EGT-II) distribution when the data are progressively type-II (PT-II) censored. We obtain maximum likelihood (ML) estimates using expectation maximization (EM) and stochastic expectation maximization (StEM) algorithms. The existence and uniqueness of the ML estimates are discussed. We construct boot- strap confidence intervals. The Bayes estimates are derived with respect to a general entropy loss function. We adopt Lindley's approximation, importance sampling and Metropolis-Hastings (MH) methods. The highest posterior density credible interval is computed based on MH algorithm. Bayesian predictors and associated Bayesian predictive interval estimates are obtained. A real life data set is considered for the purpose of illustration. Finally, we propose different criteria for comparison of different sampling schemes in order to obtain the optimal sampling scheme.
REVSTAT-Statistical Journal, Vol. 21 No. 4 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal
MH algorithm, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, Statistics, Bayesian inference, Point estimation, stochastic EM algorithm, Estimation in survival analysis and censored data, optimal censoring, QA273-280, HA1-4737, importance sampling, EM algorithm, Lindley's approximation, Probabilities. Mathematical statistics, Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators
MH algorithm, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, Statistics, Bayesian inference, Point estimation, stochastic EM algorithm, Estimation in survival analysis and censored data, optimal censoring, QA273-280, HA1-4737, importance sampling, EM algorithm, Lindley's approximation, Probabilities. Mathematical statistics, Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
