
With the aid of large language models, current conversational recommender system (CRS) has gaining strong abilities to persuade users to accept recommended items. While these CRSs are highly persuasive, they can mislead users by incorporating incredible information in their explanations, ultimately damaging the long-term trust between users and the CRS. To address this, we propose a simple yet effective method, called PC-CRS, to enhance the credibility of CRS's explanations during persuasion. It guides the explanation generation through our proposed credibility-aware persuasive strategies and then gradually refines explanations via post-hoc self-reflection. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of PC-CRS in promoting persuasive and credible explanations. Further analysis reveals the reason behind current methods producing incredible explanations and the potential of credible explanations to improve recommendation accuracy.
Findings of EMNLP 2024. Our code is available at https://github.com/mumen798/PC-CRS
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Persuasion strategies, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), 330, Computer Sciences, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Conversational recommender system, Computation and Language (cs.CL), CRS, Persuasion explanations
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Persuasion strategies, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), 330, Computer Sciences, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Conversational recommender system, Computation and Language (cs.CL), CRS, Persuasion explanations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
