
There is mounting evidence of the value of clinical genome sequencing (cGS) in individuals with suspected rare genetic disease (RGD), but cGS performance and impact on clinical care in a diverse population drawn from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been investigated. The iHope program, a philanthropic cGS initiative, established a network of 24 clinical sites in eight countries through which it provided cGS to individuals with signs or symptoms of an RGD and constrained access to molecular testing. A total of 1,004 individuals (median age, 6.5 years; 53.5% male) with diverse ancestral backgrounds (51.8% non-majority European) were assessed from June 2016 to September 2021. The diagnostic yield of cGS was 41.4% (416/1,004), with individuals from LMIC sites 1.7 times more likely to receive a positive test result compared to HIC sites (LMIC 56.5% [195/345] vs. HIC 33.5% [221/659], OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.4, p < 0.0001). A change in diagnostic evaluation occurred in 76.9% (514/668) of individuals. Change of management, inclusive of specialty referrals, imaging and testing, therapeutic interventions, and palliative care, was reported in 41.4% (285/694) of individuals, which increased to 69.2% (480/694) when genetic counseling and avoidance of additional testing were also included. Individuals from LMIC sites were as likely as their HIC counterparts to experience a change in diagnostic evaluation (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.1-∞, p = 0.05) and change of management (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.49). Increased access to genomic testing may support diagnostic equity and the reduction of global health care disparities.
Rare genetic disease, Male, Genetic testing, EXOME, clinical utility, Genetics & genetic processes, Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics, Clinical genome testing, RECOMMENDATIONS, Génétique & processus génétiques, clinical genome testing, Diagnostic equity, Child, Genetics (clinical), 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Life sciences, Whole-genome sequencin, whole-genome sequencing, Child, Preschool, Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis, Sciences du vivant, Female, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Genetic Testing/methods, diagnostic equity, Adult, Adolescent, 610, rare disease, change of management, Article, genetic testing, Rare Diseases/genetics, Rare Diseases, Genetics, Humans, Genetic Testing, rare genetic disease, low- and middle-income, Science & Technology, 42 Health sciences, Whole Genome Sequencing, 31 Biological sciences, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Infant, Rare Diseases/diagnosis, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, 06 Biological Sciences, Clinical utility, Change of management, Low- and middle-income, Rare disease
Rare genetic disease, Male, Genetic testing, EXOME, clinical utility, Genetics & genetic processes, Genetic Diseases, Inborn/genetics, Clinical genome testing, RECOMMENDATIONS, Génétique & processus génétiques, clinical genome testing, Diagnostic equity, Child, Genetics (clinical), 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity, Life sciences, Whole-genome sequencin, whole-genome sequencing, Child, Preschool, Genetic Diseases, Inborn/diagnosis, Sciences du vivant, Female, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Genetic Testing/methods, diagnostic equity, Adult, Adolescent, 610, rare disease, change of management, Article, genetic testing, Rare Diseases/genetics, Rare Diseases, Genetics, Humans, Genetic Testing, rare genetic disease, low- and middle-income, Science & Technology, 42 Health sciences, Whole Genome Sequencing, 31 Biological sciences, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Infant, Rare Diseases/diagnosis, 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences, 06 Biological Sciences, Clinical utility, Change of management, Low- and middle-income, Rare disease
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
