
The article examines the complex interplay between democracy and nationalism from a socio-philosophical perspective. The author traces the evolution of views on this relationship – from classical liberal thinkers (J. S. Mill, J. J. Rousseau) to contemporary philosophers and political scientists (F. Fukuyama, G. Nodia, B. Yack). The study reveals the dialectical nature of these phenomena: while nationalism can foster civic identity and social solidarity, it may also provoke conflicts. The author emphasizes that despite their contradictions, nationalism and democracy remain fundamentally interconnected and can serve as foundations for developing civic identity and social cohesion.
социальная солидарность, GN301-674, гражданская идентичность, Archaeology, D1-2009, национальное чувство, демократия, History (General), национализм, CC1-960, Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
социальная солидарность, GN301-674, гражданская идентичность, Archaeology, D1-2009, национальное чувство, демократия, History (General), национализм, CC1-960, Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
