
arXiv: 2205.03670
The configuration of radar networks is a complex problem that is often performed manually by experts with the help of a simulator. Different numbers and types of radars as well as different locations that the radars shall cover give rise to different instances of the radar configuration problem. The exact modeling of these instances is complex, as the quality of the configurations depends on a large number of parameters, on internal radar processing, and on the terrains on which the radars need to be placed. Classic optimization algorithms can therefore not be applied to this problem, and we rely on "trial-and-error" black-box approaches. In this paper, we study the performances of 13 black-box optimization algorithms on 153 radar network configuration problem instances. The algorithms perform considerably better than human experts. Their ranking, however, depends on the budget of configurations that can be evaluated and on the elevation profile of the location. We therefore also investigate automated algorithm selection approaches. Our results demonstrate that a pipeline that extracts instance features from the elevation of the terrain performs on par with the classical, far more expensive approach that extracts features from the objective function.
Author-generated version of a paper in the proceedings of The Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2022 (GECCO 2022)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, exploratory landscape analysis, evolutionary computation, [INFO.INFO-NE] Computer Science [cs]/Neural and Evolutionary Computing [cs.NE], Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing, Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE), radar network configuration, algorithm selection, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, exploratory landscape analysis, evolutionary computation, [INFO.INFO-NE] Computer Science [cs]/Neural and Evolutionary Computing [cs.NE], Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing, Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE), radar network configuration, algorithm selection, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
