
Neuroimaging and patient studies show that different areas of cortex respectively specialize for general and selective, or category-specific, semantic processing. Why are there both semantic hubs and category-specificity, and how come that they emerge in different cortical regions? Can the activation time-course of these areas be predicted and explained by brain-like network models? In this present work, we extend a neurocomputational model of human cortical function to simulate the time-course of cortical processes of understanding meaningful concrete words. The model implements frontal and temporal cortical areas for language, perception, and action along with their connectivity. It uses Hebbian learning to semantically ground words in aspects of their referential object- and action-related meaning. Compared with earlier proposals, the present model incorporates additional neuroanatomical links supported by connectivity studies and downscaled synaptic weights in order to control for functional between-area differences purely due to the number of in- or output links of an area. We show that learning of semantic relationships between words and the objects and actions these symbols are used to speak about, leads to the formation of distributed circuits, which all include neuronal material in connector hub areas bridging between sensory and motor cortical systems. Therefore, these connector hub areas acquire a role as semantic hubs. By differentially reaching into motor or visual areas, the cortical distributions of the emergent ‘semantic circuits’ reflect aspects of the represented symbols’ meaning, thus explaining category-specificity. The improved connectivity structure of our model entails a degree of category-specificity even in the ‘semantic hubs’ of the model. The relative time-course of activation of these areas is typically fast and near-simultaneous, with semantic hubs central to the network structure activating before modality-preferential areas carrying semantic information.
Male, Cognitive Neuroscience, Models, Neurological, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Neural Pathways, Word recognition EEG-MEG responses, Humans, Learning, Computer Simulation, Cortical connectivity, semantic grounding, Cerebral Cortex, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Word acquisition, Semantics, 100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::152 Sinneswahrnehmung, Bewegung, Emotionen, Triebe, Semantic grounding, Female, Hebbian cell assembly, Biologically inspired neural network, 100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::153 Kognitive Prozesse, Intelligenz
Male, Cognitive Neuroscience, Models, Neurological, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Neural Pathways, Word recognition EEG-MEG responses, Humans, Learning, Computer Simulation, Cortical connectivity, semantic grounding, Cerebral Cortex, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Word acquisition, Semantics, 100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::152 Sinneswahrnehmung, Bewegung, Emotionen, Triebe, Semantic grounding, Female, Hebbian cell assembly, Biologically inspired neural network, 100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::153 Kognitive Prozesse, Intelligenz
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 104 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
