
Visual Analogue Scales (VASs) are increasingly popular in psychological, social, andmedical research. However, VASs can also be more demanding for respondents, potentiallyleading to quicker disengagement and a higher risk of careless responding. Existing mixturemodeling approaches for careless response detection have so far only been available forLikert-type and unbounded continuous data but have not been tailored to VAS data. Thisstudy introduces and evaluates a model-based approach specifically designed to detect andaccount for careless respondents in VAS data. To this end, we integrate existingmeasurement models for VASs (Noel and Dauvier, 2007) with mixture item response theorymodels for identifying and modeling careless responding. Simulation results show that the proposed model effectively detects careless responding and recovers key parameters, and highlights the unsuitability of the existing mixture factor analysis model for VAS data. Weillustrate the model’s potential for identifying and accounting for careless responding usingreal data from both VASs and Likert scales. First, we show how the model can be used tocompare careless responding across different scale types, revealing a slightly higherproportion of careless respondents in VAS compared to Likert scale data. Second, wedemonstrate that item parameters from the proposed model, accounting for carelessresponding, exhibit improved psychometric properties compared to those from a modelthat ignores it. These findings underscore the model’s potential to enhance data quality byidentifying and addressing careless responding.
Visual analogue scale (VAS), Application and Case Studies - Original, careless respondents, Mixture modeling, visual analogue scale (VAS), Careless respondents, mixture modeling
Visual analogue scale (VAS), Application and Case Studies - Original, careless respondents, Mixture modeling, visual analogue scale (VAS), Careless respondents, mixture modeling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
