
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the influence of irreversible image compression at varying levels on image post-processing algorithms (3D volume rendering of angiographs, computer-assisted detection of lung nodules, segmentation and volumetry of liver lesions, and automated evaluation of functional cardiac imaging) in computed tomography (CT). METHODS Uncompressed CT image data (30 angiographs of the lower limbs, 38 lung exams, 20 liver exams and 30 cardiac exams) were anonymized and subsequently compressed using the JPEG2000 algorithm with compression ratios of 8:1, 10:1, and 15:1. Volume renderings of CT angiographies obtained from compressed and uncompressed data were compared using objective and subjective measures. Computer-assisted detection of lung nodules was performed on compressed and uncompressed image data and compared with respect to diagnostic performance. Segmentation and volumetry of liver lesions as well as measurement of ejection fraction on cardiac studies was performed on compressed and uncompressed datasets; differences in measurements were analyzed. RESULTS No differences could be detected for the 3D volume renderings and no statistically significant differences in performance were found for the computer-assisted detection algorithm. Measurements in volumetry of liver lesions and functional cardiac imaging showed good to excellent reliability. CONCLUSION Irreversible image compression within the limits proposed by the European Society of Radiology has no significant influence on commonly used image post-processing algorithms in CT.
R895-920, Reproducibility of Results, Extremities, Heart, Data Compression, Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine, Liver, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung, Retrospective Studies
R895-920, Reproducibility of Results, Extremities, Heart, Data Compression, Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine, Liver, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Lung, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
