Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ SERIES CHEMISTRY AND...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
SERIES CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF A MULTISTAGE GRAVITATIONAL CLASSIFIER

Authors: А. Leudanski; D. Chirkun; V. Golubev; D. Sarsenbekuly; D. Zhumadullayev;

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF A MULTISTAGE GRAVITATIONAL CLASSIFIER

Abstract

The classification of polydisperse materials is widely used in many industries. Of the wide range ofclassification equipment, the most promising are multistage gravitational classifiers. The classification process inmultistage gravitational classifiers is quite complicated and requires the necessary experimental research to ensurethe given efficiency. To receive reliable information allowing to obtain the most effective recommendations for theirstructure and use, a set of experimental research was carried out. The research results showed that multistageclassifiers of small sizes provide a consistently high quality of separation, however their performance, for anapparatus with a cross section of 80x80 mm no more than 100 kg/h, is insignificant, as a result of which they cannotbe used for most production processes. Classifiers with higher performance must have significant sizes. It isadvisable to use multistage shelf classifiers with boundary separation sizes of 0.5-2 mm. With a boundary size of lessthan 0.5 mm, a steady decrease in the separation efficiency is observed, and with a boundary size of the order of0.05-0.1 mm, the classification efficiency decreases sharply. With an increase in the boundary separation grain ofmore than 2 mm, a decrease in the classification efficiency is also observed (figure 1). The experiments to determinethe separation efficiency in the modernized and conventional structures of classifiers in the separation of quartz sandwith particle sizes of 0-2 mm relative to the boundary separation size of гр = 1 mm showed the following. Themutual arrangement of the efficiency curves shows that an increase in the separation efficiency for the modernizedclassifier is up to 10% when the optimum, providing the highest quality separation, air velocity per section of theapparatus is achieved. Similar results were obtained for other materials (sylvinite, meal, gypsum) for variousboundary separation sizes (from 0.5 to 2 mm). In general, the separation efficiency in the modernized structure of theshelf classifier for various materials was 5-10% higher than in a conventional one. The experimental research of themodernized classifier structure showed that the proposed structural additions, ceteris paribus, contribute to a moreuniform distribution of material over the working volume of the apparatus, which, of course, leads to an increase inthe quality of separation.

Keywords

многокаскадные классификаторы, gravitational classifiers, классификационное оборудование, разделение частиц, multistage classifiers, гравитационные классификаторы

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
gold