
doi: 10.3233/shti220501
pmid: 35612122
Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) have adverse health consequences, particularly in elderly patients. Various explicit criteria have been developed to detect PIMs. However, it is difficult to apply these criteria without the help of an electronic decision support tool. Programming these tools can be very complex. Indeed, for computer scientists it is difficult to understand medical issues and for clinicians it is difficult to program in a computer programming language. In this work we present Speak-PIM, a framework for formalizing the PIM’s rules. Speak-PIM is based on a very simple semantics which is suitable for the declaration of PIMs without embarking on all the complexity of description logic or computer languages. It aims to offer an efficient collaboration between the computer scientists and clinicians.
MESH: Aged, MESH: Humans, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Inappropriate Prescribing, Decision Support System, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Terminology, Computer programming, 004, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], MESH: Inappropriate Prescribing, 617, MESH: Potentially Inappropriate Medication List, Humans, [INFO]Computer Science [cs], Potentially inappropriate medications, Therapeutic guidelines, Potentially Inappropriate Medication List, Aged
MESH: Aged, MESH: Humans, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Inappropriate Prescribing, Decision Support System, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Terminology, Computer programming, 004, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], MESH: Inappropriate Prescribing, 617, MESH: Potentially Inappropriate Medication List, Humans, [INFO]Computer Science [cs], Potentially inappropriate medications, Therapeutic guidelines, Potentially Inappropriate Medication List, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
