
Abstract Background In esophageal carcinoma, the numbers of metastatic and total removed lymph nodes (LN) are well-established variables of long-term prognosis. The overall rate of retrieved LN depends on neoadjuvant treatment, the extent of surgical lymphadenectomy, and the modality of the pathological workup. The question in this study is whether technically extended histopathological preparation can increase the number of detected (metastatic) LN with an impact on nodal UICC staging. Patients and Methods A cohort of 77 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma was treated with Ivor Lewis esophagectomy including standardized two-field lymphadenectomy. The specimens were grossed, and all manually detectable LN were retrieved. The remaining tissue was completely embedded by the advanced “acetone compression” retrieval technique. The primary outcome parameter was the total number of detected lymph nodes before and after acetone workup. Results A mean number of 23,1 LN was diagnosed after standard manual LN preparation. With complete embedding of the fatty tissue using acetone compression, the number increased to 40.5 lymph nodes (p < 0.0001). The mean number of metastatic LN increased from 3.2 to 4.2 nodal metastases following acetone compression (p < 0.0001). Additional LN metastases which caused a change in the primary (y)pN stage were found in ten patients (13.0%). Conclusions Advanced lymph node retrieval by acetone compression allows a reliable statement on the real number of removed LN. Results demonstrate an impact on the nodal UICC stage. A future multicenter study will examine the prognostic impact of improved lymph node retrieval on long-term oncologic outcome.
Esophagectomy, Esophageal Neoplasms, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Lymph Nodes/pathology [MeSH] ; UICC stage ; Esophagectomy [MeSH] ; Esophagectomy ; Humans [MeSH] ; Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology [MeSH] ; Lymph Node Excision [MeSH] ; Thoracic Oncology ; Neoplasm Staging [MeSH] ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Prognosis [MeSH] ; Esophageal adenocarcinoma ; Lymph Nodes/surgery [MeSH] ; Lymph nodes ; Adenocarcinoma/surgery [MeSH] ; Acetone compression, Lymph Nodes, Adenocarcinoma, Thoracic Oncology, Prognosis, Neoplasm Staging
Esophagectomy, Esophageal Neoplasms, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Lymph Nodes/pathology [MeSH] ; UICC stage ; Esophagectomy [MeSH] ; Esophagectomy ; Humans [MeSH] ; Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology [MeSH] ; Lymph Node Excision [MeSH] ; Thoracic Oncology ; Neoplasm Staging [MeSH] ; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Prognosis [MeSH] ; Esophageal adenocarcinoma ; Lymph Nodes/surgery [MeSH] ; Lymph nodes ; Adenocarcinoma/surgery [MeSH] ; Acetone compression, Lymph Nodes, Adenocarcinoma, Thoracic Oncology, Prognosis, Neoplasm Staging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
