
The dynamic features of the JavaScript language not only promote various means for users to interact with websites through Web browsers, but also pose serious security threats to both users and websites. On top of this, obfuscation has become a popular technique among malicious JavaScript code that tries to hide its malicious purpose and to evade the detection of anti-virus software. To defend against obfuscated malicious JavaScript code, in this paper we propose a mostly static approach called JStill. JStill captures some essential characteristics of obfuscated malicious code by function invocation based analysis. It also leverages the combination of static analysis and lightweight runtime inspection so that it can not only detect, but also prevent the execution of the obfuscated malicious JavaScript code in browsers. Our evaluation based on real-world malicious JavaScript samples as well as Alexa top 50,000 websites demonstrates high detection accuracy (all in our experiment) and low false positives of JStill. Meanwhile, JStill only incurs negligible performance overhead, making it a practical solution to preventing obfuscated malicious JavaScript code.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 60 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
