Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.2312/gch.20221223
Multimodal imaging is used by conservators and scientists to study the composition of paintings. To aid the combined analysis of these digitisations, such images must first be aligned. Rather than proposing a new domain-specific descriptor, we explore and evaluate how existing feature descriptors from related fields can improve the performance of feature-based painting digitisation registration. We benchmark these descriptors on pixel-precise, manually aligned digitisations of ''Girl with a Pearl Earring'' by Johannes Vermeer (c. 1665, Mauritshuis) and of ''18th-Century Portrait of a Woman''. As a baseline we compare against the well-established classical SIFT descriptor. We consider two recent descriptors: the handcrafted multimodal MFD descriptor, and the learned unimodal SuperPoint descriptor. Experiments show that SuperPoint starkly increases description matching accuracy by 40% for modalities with little modality-specific artefacts. Further, performing craquelure segmentation and using the MFD descriptor results in significant description matching accuracy improvements for modalities with many modalityspecific artefacts.
Jules van der Toorn, Ruben Wiersma, Abbie Vandivere, Ricardo Marroquim, and Elmar Eisemann
Session 3
Fine arts, Technical Imaging, Image processing, Image Processing, Applied computing, Cultural Heritage, Image registration, Computing methodologies, CCS Concepts: Computing methodologies --> Image processing; Applied computing --> Fine arts
Fine arts, Technical Imaging, Image processing, Image Processing, Applied computing, Cultural Heritage, Image registration, Computing methodologies, CCS Concepts: Computing methodologies --> Image processing; Applied computing --> Fine arts
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 14 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts