
AbstractExpanding in both scope and scale, ecosystem restoration needs to embrace complex social–ecological dynamics. To help scientists and practitioners navigate ever new demands on restoration, we propose the “social–ecological ladder of restoration ambition” as a conceptual model to approach dynamically shifting social and ecological restoration goals. The model focuses on three dynamic aspects of restoration, namely degrading processes, restoration goals and remedial actions. As these three change through time, new reinforcing and balancing feedback mechanisms characterize the restoration process. We illustrate our model through case studies in which restoration has become increasingly ambitious through time, namely forest landscape restoration in Rwanda and grassland restoration in Germany. The ladder of restoration ambition offers a new way of applying social–ecological systems thinking to ecosystem restoration. Additionally, it raises awareness of social–ecological trade-offs, power imbalances and conflicting goals in restoration projects, thereby laying an important foundation for finding more practicable and fairer solutions.
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3305; name=Geography, Planning and Development, Conservation of Natural Resources, Rwanda, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/biology; name=Ecosystems Research, Forests, Models, Theoretical, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304; name=Environmental Chemistry, Grassland, Ecosystem restoration, Grassland restoration, Grassland restoration ; Rwanda [MeSH] ; Grassland [MeSH] ; Ecosystem [MeSH] ; Forest landscape restoration ; Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods [MeSH] ; Perspective ; Models, Theoretical [MeSH] ; Ecosystem restoration ; Germany [MeSH] ; Conservation of Natural Resources/methods [MeSH] ; Social–ecological systems ; Forests [MeSH], Forest landscape restoration, Germany, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303; name=Ecology, Perspective, Social–ecological systems, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/557265479; name=Environmental planning, Ecosystem, Environmental Restoration and Remediation
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3305; name=Geography, Planning and Development, Conservation of Natural Resources, Rwanda, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/biology; name=Ecosystems Research, Forests, Models, Theoretical, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304; name=Environmental Chemistry, Grassland, Ecosystem restoration, Grassland restoration, Grassland restoration ; Rwanda [MeSH] ; Grassland [MeSH] ; Ecosystem [MeSH] ; Forest landscape restoration ; Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods [MeSH] ; Perspective ; Models, Theoretical [MeSH] ; Ecosystem restoration ; Germany [MeSH] ; Conservation of Natural Resources/methods [MeSH] ; Social–ecological systems ; Forests [MeSH], Forest landscape restoration, Germany, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303; name=Ecology, Perspective, Social–ecological systems, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/557265479; name=Environmental planning, Ecosystem, Environmental Restoration and Remediation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
