
Evaluating the geotechnical properties of evaporitic rocks is crucial for infrastructure stability; however, traditional methods are costly and labour-intensive. In this study, machine learning (ML) regression algorithms were applied to predict four key mechanical parameters, namely, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), point load index (PLI), indirect tensile strength (ITS), and Schmidt hardness value (SHV), based on the physical attributes of evaporitic rocks. A comprehensive laboratory analysis of 149 block samples from Abu Dhabi was performed to measure their physical (density, porosity, unit weight, water content, specific gravity, and void ratio) and mechanical properties. Nine ML models were trained (80:20 data split) and validated using R-squared (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root-mean square error (RMSE). Nonlinear correlations demonstrated strong relationships between the mechanical properties and physical attributes, such as saturated density (s) and natural unit weight (n). After feature selection, random forest and XGBoost outperformed the other models with exceptional accuracy for UCS prediction (R ${}^{2} =0.95$ ) and robust performance for ITS (R ${}^{2} =0.84$ ) and SHV (R ${}^{2} =0.77$ ). This study advances previous research by simultaneously predicting multiple mechanical properties, offering an efficient alternative to expensive laboratory tests. The study findings highlight the potential of ML for improving geotechnical workflows by enabling rapid data-driven examinations of rock durability and stability.
machine learning, geotechnical engineering, nonlinear correlations, ensemble learning, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, mechanical properties, Evaporitic rocks, TK1-9971
machine learning, geotechnical engineering, nonlinear correlations, ensemble learning, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, mechanical properties, Evaporitic rocks, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
