
pmid: 31394170
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a new kind of endogenous non-coding RNAs, which have been discovered continuously. More and more studies have shown that circRNAs are related to the occurrence and development of human diseases. Identification of circRNAs associated with diseases can contribute to understand the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of diseases. However, experimental methods of circRNA prediction remain expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, it is urgent to propose novel computational methods for the prediction of circRNA-disease associations. In this study, we develop a computational method called LLCDC that integrates the known circRNA-disease associations, circRNA semantic similarity network, disease semantic similarity network, reconstructed circRNA similarity network, and reconstructed disease similarity network to predict circRNAs related to human diseases. Specifically, the reconstructed similarity networks are obtained by using Locality-Constrained Linear Coding (LLC) on the known association matrix, cosine similarities of circRNAs and diseases. Then, the label propagation method is applied to the similarity networks, and four relevant score matrices are respectively obtained. Finally, we use 5-fold cross validation (5-fold CV) to evaluate the performance of LLCDC, and the AUC value of the method is 0.9177, indicating that our method performs better than the other three methods. In addition, case studies on gastric cancer, breast cancer and papillary thyroid carcinoma further verify the reliability of our method in predicting disease-associated circRNAs.
Neoplasms, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, RNA, Circular, Algorithms, Genome-Wide Association Study
Neoplasms, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, RNA, Circular, Algorithms, Genome-Wide Association Study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
