Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Clinical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Serveur académique lausannois
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Tumor control and radiobiological fingerprint after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for posterior fossa meningiomas: A series of 46 consecutive cases

Authors: Dedeciusova, M.; Komarc, M.; Faouzi, M.; Levivier, M.; Tuleasca, C.;

Tumor control and radiobiological fingerprint after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for posterior fossa meningiomas: A series of 46 consecutive cases

Abstract

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR) can be a valuable treatment option for posterior cranial fossa meningiomas (PCFM). We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of GKR for PCFM.Were included forty-six patients with 47 PCFM. Primary endpoint was tumor control. Secondary endpoint was clinical improvement. Biologically effective dose (BED) was evaluated in relationship to primary and secondary outcomes. Mean marginal dose was 12.4 Gy (median 12, 12-14). Mean BED was 63.6 Gy (median 65, 49.1-88.3). Mean target volume (TV) was 2.21 cc (range 0.3-8.9 cc).Overall tumor control rate was 93.6% (44/47) after mean follow-up of 47.8 months ± 28.46 months (median 45.5, range 6-108). Radiological progression-free survival at 5 years was 94%. Higher pretherapeutic TVs were predictive for higher likelihood of tumor progression (Odds ratio, OR 1.448, 95% confidence interval - CI 1.001-2.093, p = 0.049). At last clinical follow-up, 28 patients (71.8%) remained stable, 10 (25.6%) improved and 1 patient (2.6%) worsened. Using logistic regression, the relationship between BED and clinical improvement was assessed (OR 0.903, standard error 0.59, coefficient 0.79-1.027, CI -0.10; 0.01; p = 0.14). The highest probability of clinical improvement corresponded to a range of BED values between 56 and 61 Gy.Primary GKR for PCFM is safe and effective. Higher pretherapeutic TV was predictor of volumetric progression. Highest probability of clinical improvement might correspond to a range of BED values between 56 and 61 Gy, although this was not statistically significant. The importance of BED should be further validated in larger cohorts, other anatomical locations and other pathologies.

Country
Switzerland
Keywords

Treatment Outcome, Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging; Meningeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy; Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery; Meningioma/diagnostic imaging; Meningioma/radiotherapy; Meningioma/surgery; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; BED; Biologically effective dose; Gamma knife; Meningioma, Meningeal Neoplasms, Humans, Meningioma, Radiosurgery, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
hybrid