
pmid: 31158521
Malaria is one of most common tropical diseases encountered in travellers and migrants. It requires an urgent and reliable diagnosis considering its potential severity. In this study, performance of five diagnostic assays were evaluated in a nonendemic region and compared prospectively to quantitative PCR (qPCR).A prospective study was conducted at Toulouse Hospital from August 2017 to January 2018 and included all patients with initial Plasmodium screening. Thin and thick blood smears (TnS, TkS), quantitative buffy coat (QBC), rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and commercial loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) were independently performed on each blood sample and compared to our qPCR reference standard.The study encompassed 331 patients, mainly returning from Africa. qPCR detected 73 Plasmodium-positive samples (including 58 falciparum). Individually, LAMP had a 97.3% (71/73) sensitivity, far ahead of TnS (84.9%, 62/73), TkS (86.3%, 63/73), QBC (86.3%, 63/73) and RDT (86.3%, 63/73). RDT demonstrated a high sensitivity for falciparum (98.3%, 57/58) but missed all ovale, malariae and knowlesi infections. Specificity was excellent for all techniques (99.6-100%). The most sensitive diagnosis strategies were TnS + RDT (95.9%, 70/73), TnS + LAMP (97.3%, 71/73) and TnS + RDT + LAMP (100%, 73/73), about 10% higher than strategies using exclusively microscopy, TkS + TnS (87.7%, 64/73) or QBC + TnS (87.7%, 64/73). TnS remains necessary for Plasmodium species identification and quantification. Adding sequentially TnS only on LAMP-positive samples did not decrease TnS + LAMP strategy sensitivity.In nonendemic countries, the currently recommended microscopy-based strategies seem unsatisfactory for malaria diagnosis considering RDT and LAMP performance, two rapid and sensitive assays that require limited training.
Plasmodium, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Alethia, 610, Rapid diagnostic test, MESH: Africa, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, MESH: Malaria / diagnosis, QBC, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thin smear, LAMP, Communicable Diseases, Imported, 616, Diagnosis, Humans, MESH: Malaria / parasitology, Prospective Studies, Imported / diagnosis, RDT, MESH: Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / methods, Imported / parasitology, Microscopy, MESH: Humans, MESH: Plasmodium, MESH: Microscopy / standards, Temperature, Loop-mediated isothermal amplification, Thick smear, MESH: Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / standards, MESH: Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / methods, MESH: Prospective Studies, MESH: Sensitivity and Specificity, MESH: Temperature, Malaria, MESH: France, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], MESH: Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / standards, MESH: Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / standards, MESH: Microscopy / methods, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Africa, MESH: Communicable Diseases, France, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
Plasmodium, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Alethia, 610, Rapid diagnostic test, MESH: Africa, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, MESH: Malaria / diagnosis, QBC, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thin smear, LAMP, Communicable Diseases, Imported, 616, Diagnosis, Humans, MESH: Malaria / parasitology, Prospective Studies, Imported / diagnosis, RDT, MESH: Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / methods, Imported / parasitology, Microscopy, MESH: Humans, MESH: Plasmodium, MESH: Microscopy / standards, Temperature, Loop-mediated isothermal amplification, Thick smear, MESH: Molecular Diagnostic Techniques / standards, MESH: Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / methods, MESH: Prospective Studies, MESH: Sensitivity and Specificity, MESH: Temperature, Malaria, MESH: France, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], MESH: Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / standards, MESH: Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / standards, MESH: Microscopy / methods, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, Africa, MESH: Communicable Diseases, France, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
