
The paper analyses the culture’s conceptual terrain from different scholarly perspectives, and how it has led to the emergence of different conceptualization of cultural intelligence. As such, cultural intelligence is described from the perspective of Earley et al.’s Thomas et al.’s and Plum’s and then explained how Plum’s conceptualization is a better construct to apply in the context of this paper and how it relates to the aims and objectives of this paper.
330, self-integration, cultural intelligence, 301, культурний інтелект, межкультурная адаптация, культурна інтеграція, самостійна інтеграція, cross-cultural adjustment, cultural integration, самостоятельная интеграция, між-культурноа адаптація, культурная интеграция, культурный интеллект
330, self-integration, cultural intelligence, 301, культурний інтелект, межкультурная адаптация, культурна інтеграція, самостійна інтеграція, cross-cultural adjustment, cultural integration, самостоятельная интеграция, між-культурноа адаптація, культурная интеграция, культурный интеллект
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
