
pmid: 38299239
Background: Despite the good clinical results in the treatment of Kienböck disease with distal radius core decompression, a radiological progression to a certain degree in the long-term follow-up is possible. Is there a negative correlation between the clinical improvement of the patients and the radiological progression? Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the radiological and clinical results of 24 patients (mean age: 38 years; 10 women) treated with core decompression for Kienböck disease. The mean follow-up was 10 years. Results: A radiologic progression in the Lichtman classification was seen in nine patients. The Spearman correlation did not show any correlation between this radiological progression and the clinical outcome. Namely −0.06 between Mayo and Lichtman classification and 0.16 between VAS and Lichtman classification. Conclusions: We found that the clinical outcomes do not deteriorate despite a radiological progression of patients treated with core decompression for Kienböck disease Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)
Adult, Decompression, Up Studies Osteotomy/methods *Osteonecrosis/diagnostic imaging/surgery Decompression Core decompression Kienbock disease Lichtman classification Lunatum malacia Os lunatum, Osteonecrosis, 610 Medicine & health, Humans Female Adult *Radius/diagnostic imaging/surgery Retrospective Studies Follow, 2746 Surgery, Osteotomy, Radius, 2732 Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Humans, 10046 Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center, Female, Retrospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Decompression, Up Studies Osteotomy/methods *Osteonecrosis/diagnostic imaging/surgery Decompression Core decompression Kienbock disease Lichtman classification Lunatum malacia Os lunatum, Osteonecrosis, 610 Medicine & health, Humans Female Adult *Radius/diagnostic imaging/surgery Retrospective Studies Follow, 2746 Surgery, Osteotomy, Radius, 2732 Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Humans, 10046 Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center, Female, Retrospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
