Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Труды Института сист...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Tools for Quality Assessment of Scientific and Technical Documents

Инструментальные средства оценки качества научно-технических документов
Authors: S. V. Gerasimov; R. V. Kurynin; I. V. Mashechkin; M. I. Petrovskiy; D. V. Tsarev; A. A. Shestimerov;

Tools for Quality Assessment of Scientific and Technical Documents

Abstract

In the paper the complex approach to scientific and technical document quality assessment is proposed based on various automatically calculated document quality characteristics as widely used bibliometric and scientometric (based on citation indices), and the new types of characteristics based on the text semantic analysis, heuristics, and also on plagiarism detection methods. The integrated indicator of scientific and technical document quality assessment is formed on the basis of the received basic characteristics with use of machine learning methods similar to the problem of ranking in information retrieval. The developed prototype system based on offered approach is presented, and also the experimental investigations of the developed system directed on check of scientific and technical document quality assessment accuracy are carried out. The analysis of the state of art researches of scientific and technical document quality assessment showed the offered approach based on enhanced list of basic characteristic groups was considered by nobody in so broad statement and as a whole is innovative. The main part of the paper has the following structure. The second section contains an analytical overview of existing approaches to assess quality of scientific and technical documents. The third section provides detail of a proposed approach to assess quality of scientific and technical documents. The forth section describes a prototype system based on the proposed approach. The fifth section discusses results of experiments.

Keywords

латентно-семантический анализ, оценка качества научно-технических документов, Electronic computers. Computer science, неотрицательная матричная факторизация, наукометрия, QA75.5-76.95, библиометрия, методы машинного обучения, тематическое моделирование

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold