
handle: 11343/352326 , 1959.4/103697
Genomic testing in prenatal care is rapidly advancing and it is now possible to obtain an entire fetal genome via a blood test administered in early pregnancy. In the pursuit of reproductive autonomy, more tests are being offered to more people, for an ever-increasing range of indications. Health professionals who provide pregnancy care are at the vanguard of prenatal testing, yet their views on the impact of technology advancements remain under-explored. Qualitative interviews with Australian healthcare professionals revealed that they value prenatal testing for its information-giving potential. However, the rationale underpinning testing reveals a tension between professionals’ desire for certainty and patients’ expectation that they will be reassured. Coupled with the greater salience of genomic information over other forms of knowledge in prenatal care, we suggest that the unchecked pursuit of information by way of genomic technologies in prenatal testing may paradoxically constrain reproductive autonomy in practice.
anzsrc-for: 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields, anzsrc-for: 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Medical philosophy. Medical ethics, Prenatal diagnosis, Reproductive health and childbirth, QH426-470, anzsrc-for: 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, Pregnancy, genomics, Genetics, R723-726, Human Genome, 3 Good Health and Well Being, 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, anzsrc-for: 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 300, anzsrc-for: 1608 Sociology, 301, 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, Women's Health, bioethics
anzsrc-for: 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields, anzsrc-for: 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Medical philosophy. Medical ethics, Prenatal diagnosis, Reproductive health and childbirth, QH426-470, anzsrc-for: 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, Pregnancy, genomics, Genetics, R723-726, Human Genome, 3 Good Health and Well Being, 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields, anzsrc-for: 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 300, anzsrc-for: 1608 Sociology, 301, 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, Women's Health, bioethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
