
Abstract Objectives The influence of cochlear morphology and electrode array design on scalar position and dislocation rates is of great interest in CI surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate scalar position and specific points of dislocation in relation to cochlear morphology in patients implanted with a new slim perimodiolar electrode array. Materials and methods Patients were implanted using the slim modiolar electrode array (= SMA) (= 532/632 electrode array of Cochlear™). Postoperative imaging was performed via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the scans were analyzed regarding cochlear morphology (distances A and B and cochlear height), scalar location of the electrode array, basal insertion depth and apical insertion angle. Furthermore, electrode array design and surgical protocols were evaluated. Results 81 ears implanted with the SMA were retrospectively included. We evaluated 3 electrode array tip fold over intraoperatively via X-ray imaging and performed revision during the same surgery. The CBCT scans showed 76 initial scala tympani (ST) insertions without dislocation. Two ears showed a dislocated array, one at 77° and the other at 163°. Three arrays were inserted into scala vestibuli (SV) via cochleostomy. These patients showed no signs of obliteration. Cochlear morphology showed no influence on angular insertion depth and scalar position. Conclusions The SMA showed a very low rate of scalar dislocations due to its slim electrode array design (2.7%). We could find a learning curve regarding the handling and the risk of dislocation and tip fold over with this electrode array. The rate of intraoperative tip fold over detection via X-ray imaging was 3.7%. Therefore, we highly recommend X-ray imaging and transimpedance matrix measurements within the surgery protocol. Scala vestibuli insertions happened in patients with cochleostomy only. We could identify two specific points of dislocation depending on electrode array design.
Cochlear Implants, 610, Humans, Otology, Humans [MeSH] ; Electrodes, Implanted [MeSH] ; Perimodiolar array ; Cochlear implant surgery ; Retrospective Studies [MeSH] ; Cochlea/surgery [MeSH] ; Otology ; Scala Tympani/surgery [MeSH] ; Cochlear Implantation/methods [MeSH] ; Electrode array design ; Scalar position ; Cochlear Implants [MeSH] ; Cochlea/anatomy ; Cochlea/diagnostic imaging [MeSH], Scala Tympani, Cochlear Implantation, Retrospective Studies, Cochlea, Electrodes, Implanted
Cochlear Implants, 610, Humans, Otology, Humans [MeSH] ; Electrodes, Implanted [MeSH] ; Perimodiolar array ; Cochlear implant surgery ; Retrospective Studies [MeSH] ; Cochlea/surgery [MeSH] ; Otology ; Scala Tympani/surgery [MeSH] ; Cochlear Implantation/methods [MeSH] ; Electrode array design ; Scalar position ; Cochlear Implants [MeSH] ; Cochlea/anatomy ; Cochlea/diagnostic imaging [MeSH], Scala Tympani, Cochlear Implantation, Retrospective Studies, Cochlea, Electrodes, Implanted
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
