
Multi-Objective and Many-objective Optimization problems have been extensively solved through evolutionary algorithms over a few decades. Despite the fact that NSGA-II and NSGA-III are frequently employed as a reference for a comparative evaluation of new evolutionary algorithms, the latter is proprietary. In this paper, we used the basic framework of the NSGA-II, which is very similar to the NSGA-III, with significant changes in its selection operator. We took the first front generated at the non-dominating sort procedure to obtain nonnegative and nonrepeated extreme points. This opensource version of the NSGA-III is called EF1-NSGA-III, and its implementation does not start from scratch; that would be reinventing the wheel. Instead, we took the NSGA-II code from the authors in the repository of the Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory to extend the EF1-NSGA-III. We then adjusted its selection operator from diversity, based on the crowding distance, to the one found on reference points and preserved its parameters. After that, we continued with the adaptive EF1-NSGA-III (A-EF1-NSGA-III), and the efficient adaptive EF1-NSGA-III (A2-EF1-NSGA-III), while also contributing to explain how to generate different types of reference points. The proposed algorithms resolve optimization problems with constraints of up to 10 objective functions. We tested them on a wide range of benchmark problems, and they showed notable improvements in terms of convergence and diversity by using the Inverted Generational Distance (IGD) and the HyperVolume (HV) performance metrics. The EF1-NSGA-III aims to resolve the power consumption for Centralized Radio Access Networks and the BiObjective Minimum DiameterCost Spanning Tree problems.
Artificial intelligence, Economics, many-objective optimization problem, Biochemistry, Gene, manyobjective optimization problem, Engineering, Selection (genetic algorithm), Range (aeronautics), problema de optimización de muchos objetivos, Subnet, sort, evolutionary algorithm, Geography, Sorting, Mathematical optimization, Next Generation 5G Wireless Networks, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Algorithm, Chemistry, Aerospace engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetic algorithm, Rank (graph theory), Physical Sciences, Convergence (economics), TA1-2040, Geodesy, Power Line Communications in Smart Grid, Operator (biology), Mathematical analysis, Evolutionary algorithm, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Economic growth, Arithmetic, Computer science, Multi-objective optimization, algoritmo evolutivo, Combinatorics, Computer Science, Repressor, Evolutionary Algorithms, Benchmark (surveying), Transcription factor, Multiobjective Optimization in Evolutionary Algorithms, Mathematics
Artificial intelligence, Economics, many-objective optimization problem, Biochemistry, Gene, manyobjective optimization problem, Engineering, Selection (genetic algorithm), Range (aeronautics), problema de optimización de muchos objetivos, Subnet, sort, evolutionary algorithm, Geography, Sorting, Mathematical optimization, Next Generation 5G Wireless Networks, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Algorithm, Chemistry, Aerospace engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetic algorithm, Rank (graph theory), Physical Sciences, Convergence (economics), TA1-2040, Geodesy, Power Line Communications in Smart Grid, Operator (biology), Mathematical analysis, Evolutionary algorithm, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, FOS: Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Economic growth, Arithmetic, Computer science, Multi-objective optimization, algoritmo evolutivo, Combinatorics, Computer Science, Repressor, Evolutionary Algorithms, Benchmark (surveying), Transcription factor, Multiobjective Optimization in Evolutionary Algorithms, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
