
pmid: 37340200
pmc: PMC10409808
Abstract Background Involved lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) have been associated with increased local recurrence (LR) and ipsi-lateral LR (LLR) rates. However, consensus regarding the indication and type of surgical treatment for suspicious LLNs is lacking. This study evaluated the surgical treatment of LLNs in an untrained setting at a national level. Methods Patients who underwent additional LLN surgery were selected from a national cross-sectional cohort study regarding patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in 69 Dutch hospitals in 2016. LLN surgery consisted of either ‘node-picking’ (the removal of an individual LLN) or ‘partial regional node dissection’ (PRND; an incomplete resection of the LLN area). For all patients with primarily enlarged (≥7 mm) LLNs, those undergoing rectal surgery with an additional LLN procedure were compared to those undergoing only rectal resection. Results Out of 3057 patients, 64 underwent additional LLN surgery, with 4-year LR and LLR rates of 26% and 15%, respectively. Forty-eight patients (75%) had enlarged LLNs, with corresponding recurrence rates of 26% and 19%, respectively. Node-picking (n = 40) resulted in a 20% 4-year LLR, and a 14% LLR after PRND (n = 8; p = 0.677). Multivariable analysis of 158 patients with enlarged LLNs undergoing additional LLN surgery (n = 48) or rectal resection alone (n = 110) showed no significant association of LLN surgery with 4-year LR or LLR, but suggested higher recurrence risks after LLN surgery (LR: hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–3.2, p = 0.264; LLR: HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.2–2.5, p = 0.874). Conclusion Evaluation of Dutch practice in 2016 revealed that approximately one-third of patients with primarily enlarged LLNs underwent surgical treatment, mostly consisting of node-picking. Recurrence rates were not significantly affected by LLN surgery, but did suggest worse outcomes. Outcomes of LLN surgery after adequate training requires further research.
Colorectal Cancer, Rectal Neoplasms, Lymph Node Excision/methods, MULTICENTER, Rectum, Radboudumc 15: Urological cancers Medical Imaging, Lymph Nodes/surgery, Neoplasm Recurrence, All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center, Cross-Sectional Studies, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Local/surgery, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Rectum/pathology, Rectal Neoplasms/pathology, Radboudumc 14: Tumours of the digestive tract Surgery, Lymph Nodes, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, DISSECTION, Retrospective Studies, Neoplasm Staging
Colorectal Cancer, Rectal Neoplasms, Lymph Node Excision/methods, MULTICENTER, Rectum, Radboudumc 15: Urological cancers Medical Imaging, Lymph Nodes/surgery, Neoplasm Recurrence, All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center, Cross-Sectional Studies, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Local/surgery, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Rectum/pathology, Rectal Neoplasms/pathology, Radboudumc 14: Tumours of the digestive tract Surgery, Lymph Nodes, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, DISSECTION, Retrospective Studies, Neoplasm Staging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
