
Abstract Background Supervised injectable opioid treatment (SIOT) is a promising alternative for people living with opioid use disorder (OUD) who have not sufficiently benefitted from oral opioid substitution treatment. Yet, SIOT utilization remains limited in Germany. We propose that this is due to beliefs, or schemas, on SIOT among people living with OUD. Drawing from medical sociology and social psychology, this study explores the emergence and evolution of such schemas on SIOT. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 34 individuals currently in or eligible for SIOT in two German outpatient treatment facilities and paralleled an inductive qualitative content analysis with the exploration of individual cases. Results The analysis revealed that peer-to-peer interaction and individuals’ practical experiences in therapy are crucial in constructing and changing idiosyncratic and shared schemas of SIOT. When facing ambiguous information, cognitive strategies like subtyping served to mitigate uncertainty. Conclusion This research has important practical implications for integrating experiential knowledge into clinical care and improve information sharing among people living with OUD. A nuanced understanding of the complex network of informal advice-seeking and -giving among people living with OUD is indispensable to adequately expand treatment modalities of proven effectiveness.
Male, Adult, Medicine (General), 330, Experiential knowledge, 150, 610, Injections, Patient perspective, Interviews as Topic, R5-920, Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, Germany, Opiate Substitution Treatment, Humans, Schema theory, HV1-9960, Qualitative Research, Research, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Analgesics, Opioid, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female [MeSH] ; Substitution therapy ; Analgesics, Opioid/administration ; Patient perspective ; Adult [MeSH] ; Experiential knowledge ; Humans [MeSH] ; Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Cross-Sectional Studies [MeSH] ; Supervised injectable opioid treatment ; Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Interviews as Topic [MeSH] ; Qualitative Research [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Research ; Germany [MeSH] ; Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Schema theory ; Injections [MeSH], Female, Substitution therapy, Supervised injectable opioid treatment
Male, Adult, Medicine (General), 330, Experiential knowledge, 150, 610, Injections, Patient perspective, Interviews as Topic, R5-920, Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, Germany, Opiate Substitution Treatment, Humans, Schema theory, HV1-9960, Qualitative Research, Research, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Analgesics, Opioid, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female [MeSH] ; Substitution therapy ; Analgesics, Opioid/administration ; Patient perspective ; Adult [MeSH] ; Experiential knowledge ; Humans [MeSH] ; Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Cross-Sectional Studies [MeSH] ; Supervised injectable opioid treatment ; Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Interviews as Topic [MeSH] ; Qualitative Research [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Research ; Germany [MeSH] ; Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Schema theory ; Injections [MeSH], Female, Substitution therapy, Supervised injectable opioid treatment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
