
There are two paths to nanostructure patterning. Self-assembly is intriguing, as it makes use of the natural tendency of materials to spontaneously coalesce into shapes of technological importance without relying on complex, expensive tools to do the job. But the number of achievable shapes and workable materials is limited, placing severe restrictions on the types of nanostructures that can be achieved. More-or-less conventional deep ultraviolet (DUV) optical printing techniques have performed astonishingly well for features sizes below 90 nm. Electron beam technology has printed arbitrary patterns with minimum feature sizes on the order of 10's of nanometers. These techniques do not suffer from the same restrictions on form and materials as self- assembly. There are restrictions, though. We address one of these here: the degree to which patterns can be faithfully reproduced as feature sizes scale to smaller dimensions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
