
Abstract Introduction In microvascular breast reconstruction, the focus has shifted to achieving aesthetically pleasing results. Delayed breast reconstruction poses challenges such as ensuring natural ptosis and avoiding a “patch” effect. The Be.A.U.T-I.F.U.L. deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap inset, presented here, offers a systematic and sequential seven-step method to optimize breast reconstruction outcomes. Methods This approach emphasizes safety during flap harvest using the best (Be.) perforator identified via computed tomography angiography to minimize dissection and ensure solid perfusion. The flap is placed obliquely, directing its tail to the axilla (A.), enhancing upper (U.) pole volume and ptosis. The flap base is tucked-in (T-I.) to increase the projection of the breast mound, and its lateral portion is split as a fishtail (F.): the upper (U.) fin is used to define the lateral inframammary fold and prevent lateral displacement of the reconstructed breast, while the lower (L.) fin is turned under the flap to further improve projection. Conclusion This structured approach, focusing on key breast aesthetics, ensures optimal cosmetic outcomes and can serve for most delayed microsurgical breast reconstruction scenarios. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Adult, Microsurgery, Time Factors, Esthetics, Mammaplasty, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Epigastric Arteries, Risk Assessment, Humans; Mammaplasty/methods; Female; Perforator Flap/blood supply; Perforator Flap/transplantation; Esthetics; Treatment Outcome; Mastectomy/methods; Breast Neoplasms/surgery; Breast Neoplasms/pathology; Epigastric Arteries/surgery; Epigastric Arteries/transplantation; Middle Aged; Adult; Time Factors; Microsurgery/methods; Follow-Up Studies; Risk Assessment; Breast neoplasms; Free tissue flaps; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Microsurgery; Patient satisfaction, Treatment Outcome, Innovative Techniques, Humans, Female, Perforator Flap, Mastectomy, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Microsurgery, Time Factors, Esthetics, Mammaplasty, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Epigastric Arteries, Risk Assessment, Humans; Mammaplasty/methods; Female; Perforator Flap/blood supply; Perforator Flap/transplantation; Esthetics; Treatment Outcome; Mastectomy/methods; Breast Neoplasms/surgery; Breast Neoplasms/pathology; Epigastric Arteries/surgery; Epigastric Arteries/transplantation; Middle Aged; Adult; Time Factors; Microsurgery/methods; Follow-Up Studies; Risk Assessment; Breast neoplasms; Free tissue flaps; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Microsurgery; Patient satisfaction, Treatment Outcome, Innovative Techniques, Humans, Female, Perforator Flap, Mastectomy, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
