
doi: 10.1002/mma.7482
In this paper, a methodology is developed to solve an uncertain multiobjective fractional programming problem in the face of data uncertainty in the objective and constraint functions. We use the robust optimization approach (worst‐case approach) for finding ɛ‐efficient solutions of the associated robust multiobjective fractional programming problem defined as a robust (worst‐case) counterpart. For the robust multiobjective fractional programming problem constructed in the robust approach, In fact, in the parametric Dinkelbach approach. We define for the given multiobjective fractional programming problem its corresponding parametric robust vector optimization problem. Then, we establish both necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a feasible solution to be an ‐efficient solution (an approximate efficient solution) of the parametric robust vector optimization problem. Also we prove the relationship between ɛ‐efficiency of the robust multiobjective fractional programming problem (and thus ɛ‐efficiency of the considered uncertain multiobjective fractional programming problem) and ‐efficiency of its corresponding parametric robust vector optimization problem constructed in the Dinkelbach approach. In order to prove this result, we also use a scalarization method. Thus, the equivalence between an approximate efficient solution of the parametric robust vector optimization problem and an approximate minimizer of its associated scalar optimization problem constructed in the used scalarization method is also established.
scalarization, Dinkelbach approach, Nonlinear programming, approximate efficiency, Nonsmooth analysis, robust methodology, uncertain multiobjective fractional programming, Fractional programming, Robustness in mathematical programming, Multi-objective and goal programming
scalarization, Dinkelbach approach, Nonlinear programming, approximate efficiency, Nonsmooth analysis, robust methodology, uncertain multiobjective fractional programming, Fractional programming, Robustness in mathematical programming, Multi-objective and goal programming
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
