
Purpose:We present an iterative framework for CT reconstruction from transmission ultrasound data which accurately and efficiently models the strong refraction effects that occur in our target application: Imaging the female breast.Methods:Our refractive ray tracing framework has its foundation in the fast marching method (FNMM) and it allows an accurate as well as efficient modeling of curved rays. We also describe a novel regularization scheme that yields further significant reconstruction quality improvements. A final contribution is the development of a realistic anthropomorphic digital breast phantom based on the NIH Visible Female data set.Results:Our system is able to resolve very fine details even in the presence of significant noise, and it reconstructs both sound speed and attenuation data. Excellent correspondence with a traditional, but significantly more computationally expensive wave equation solver is achieved.Conclusions:Apart from the accurate modeling of curved rays, decisive factors have also been our regularization scheme and the high‐quality interpolation filter we have used. An added benefit of our framework is that it accelerates well on GPUs where we have shown that clinical 3D reconstruction speeds on the order of minutes are possible.
Time Factors, tomography, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Keywords: algorithm, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, image quality, Animals, Humans, animal, human, Tomography, time, Computer-, Phantoms, Imaging, three dimensional imaging, article, feasibility study, methodology, image processing, 004, echomammography, female, Feasibility Studies, Female, Ultrasonography, Mammary, Algorithms
Time Factors, tomography, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Keywords: algorithm, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, image quality, Animals, Humans, animal, human, Tomography, time, Computer-, Phantoms, Imaging, three dimensional imaging, article, feasibility study, methodology, image processing, 004, echomammography, female, Feasibility Studies, Female, Ultrasonography, Mammary, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
